How to Reduce Telecom, Utility and IT Operational Costs
Organizations with locations across multiple sites typically lose 15% to 30% of their total telecom, utility and IT spend to billing errors, unused services and accounts still billing after a location closes. A data-driven, line-item audit finds and recovers that leak; a percentage-based budget cut across every department does not.
Important Points Explained Ahead
- Across-the-board budget cuts typically return 3-8% in savings and are often reversed within 12 months. A line-item audit against contracted rates returns 15-30%, sustained through ongoing monthly review.
- Most telecom, utility and IT audits are run in isolation from each other, even though the same billing failures (zero-use accounts, expired contract rates, vacant-site charges) recur across all three categories.
- Manually processing a single invoice costs more than $13 before any auditing happens, which is a hidden cost most facilities and operations budgets never itemize.
- The four-step path is: build spend visibility, categorize by impact rather than department, take targeted action, then track recovery with fixed KPIs.
- ExpenseLogic combines automated line-item audits with a managed team that recovers dollars from vendors directly, not just a report that flags them.
Short version: the fastest way to cut operational costs without cutting service is to audit what you are actually being billed against what your contracts say you owe, across telecom, utility and IT together, not department by department.
Reactive Cuts vs. Data-Driven Cost Reduction
A facilities director at a 60-location retail chain builds next quarter’s budget knowing rent is fixed and payroll is set by headcount, while telecom, utility and IT costs across those 60 sites have drifted from what the contracts actually specify. Three locations that closed last quarter are still billing for internet service, and no one has audited a single invoice against its contract terms in over a year.
| Approach | Reactive cost-cutting | Data-driven expense management |
|---|---|---|
| Starting point | Percentage cuts applied across every department | Line-item audit of invoices against contracted rates |
| Primary risk | Service disruption, lower morale, cuts to essential functions | Minimal, since reductions target billing errors and unused services first |
| Typical Year 1 impact | 3 to 8% savings, often reversed within 12 months | 15 to 30% savings, sustained through ongoing monthly audits |
| Visibility required | Department-level budget totals | Location, meter and service-ID level detail |
| Sustainability | Short-term, requires repeated rounds of cuts | Long-term, built into a recurring monthly process |
Operational costs concentrate in four areas: facilities and utilities, telecom and IT, labor and administrative overhead, and vendor or procurement contracts. Without a centralized system tracking these across dozens or hundreds of locations, the 15% to 30% waste figure above is exactly where the gap hides, because no single department owns the full picture.
The Real Cost of Doing Nothing
Manual, decentralized expense tracking carries its own price tag before a single dollar of waste is even found, which most budgets never line-item separately. Processing one invoice manually, before any auditing takes place, typically costs more than $13, and that figure multiplies fast across hundreds of locations and multiple vendors.
A mid-market organization with $2 million in annual telecom, utility and IT spend across 40 locations, at a conservative 15% recovery rate well within what multi-location organizations typically achieve, returns $300,000 directly to the bottom line in year one. That range reflects outcomes RadiusPoint clients see using ExpenseLogic, where average cost reductions have exceeded 30% in the first year.
A Four-Step Framework for Sustainable Cost Reduction
Sustainable cost reduction follows a fixed sequence rather than a one-time project, since skipping straight to cuts before visibility exists is what makes reactive cost-cutting fail in the first place. Each step below builds on the one before it.
1. Build complete spend visibility
Aggregate every operational invoice, telecom, utility, IT and facilities cost into a single centralized platform. This creates a cost baseline analyzable by location, vendor and service category, which is the piece most decentralized organizations are missing entirely.
2. Categorize by impact, not by department
With a clear view of spending, classify each cost as essential, value-add or non-essential. This prioritizes reduction efforts on services that will not affect core operations, rather than cutting indiscriminately across every budget line regardless of what it actually pays for.
3. Take targeted action
Standardize procurement and payment processes across locations to eliminate rogue spending, and right-size vendor contracts by identifying consolidation and renegotiation opportunities. Eliminating zero-use devices, ghost lines and vacant-location utility billing is where property management and multi-site retail clients most reliably find money.
4. Track the right KPIs
Operational cost reduction requires ongoing measurement, not a one-time project, so the KPIs below need a standing owner and a recurring review cadence.
| KPI | What it measures |
|---|---|
| Telecom, utility and IT spend as % of revenue | Whether operational costs are scaling faster than the business |
| Cost recovery rate | Dollars recovered from billing errors and disputes, month over month |
| Zero-use asset rate | Percentage of billed services with no active usage |
| Spend visibility coverage | Percentage of total locations and invoices captured in a centralized platform |
How ExpenseLogic Turns Visibility Into Recovered Dollars
Sustainable cost reduction is difficult to achieve with manual processes and disconnected spreadsheets spread across dozens of locations. RadiusPoint’s ExpenseLogic platform combines automated line-item audits with a managed services team that works directly with vendors to recover funds, not just flag them on a report someone has to act on separately.
For a Fortune 100 paper manufacturer managing 10,000-plus wireless devices globally, that meant $450,000 in telecom refunds and $1.3 million in total Year 1 impact. For a global elevator company operating across 40 locations, contract optimization through utility expense management delivered a 28% reduction in monthly waste expenditure, worth $180,000 annually. For a national homebuilder, streamlining utility setup and shutdown processes eliminated $25,000 a month in payments for services at closed locations.
Where Telecom, Utility and IT Waste Actually Hides
Most telecom audit providers only look at telecom, and most utility auditors only look at utility, which means the same three failure patterns recur unaddressed in whichever category nobody is watching. Multi-location organizations lose the most ground in the gap between categories, not inside any one of them.
A telecom expense management provider evaluation should specifically ask whether utility and IT invoices are audited on the same schedule and platform, since running three separate vendor relationships for three expense categories recreates the visibility gap this framework is meant to close. RadiusPoint audits telecom, utility and IT spend through one ExpenseLogic account rather than three disconnected engagements.
Frequently Asked Questions
How fast can a multi-location organization expect to see results?
Most organizations see initial billing error findings within the first 60 to 90 days of a line-item audit, since that is how long it takes to pull twelve months of invoice history against current contract terms. Full-year recovery, including vendor credit processing, typically plays out across the first twelve months.
Is a 15% to 30% savings range realistic for a smaller organization?
The percentage range holds at smaller scale, though the dollar impact is proportionally smaller. What matters more than headcount or location count is how long it has been since the last full audit; organizations that have never audited telecom, utility and IT invoices together tend to land at the higher end of the range.
Do budget cuts and line-item audits have to be an either-or choice?
No. Many organizations run both: an immediate percentage cut to stop near-term bleeding, paired with a line-item audit that replaces the cut with a sustainable, targeted recovery once the data exists. The audit is what prevents the cut from needing to be repeated next year.
What is the biggest blind spot in multi-location cost reduction?
Vacant or closed locations that keep billing for utility, internet and phone service. It is the single most common finding across property management, retail and multi-site healthcare clients, because closing a location is an operations event, not a billing event, and nobody tells the vendor to stop.
How We Researched This
This page draws on RadiusPoint’s own client engagement outcomes across telecom, utility and IT expense management since 1992, and current search results for multi-location telecom and operational cost reduction guidance. It was reviewed by Sharon Watkins, RadiusPoint’s founder and CEO.
Latest Updates
August 28, 2026: Rewritten to add an Important Points Explained Ahead summary, a category-crossing waste section, FAQ, and to correct internal links to current, verified live pages.
References
- RadiusPoint client engagement data, telecom, utility and IT expense management, 1992 to present
- Gartner Research, cost reduction outcomes for managed telecom expense platforms
Related Articles
- Telecom Expense Management
- Utility Expense Management
- Vacant Cost Recovery
- Questions to Ask a TEM Provider Before You Sign
- ExpenseLogic
Savings ranges and case outcomes reflect specific client engagements and are not a guarantee of results for every organization. Actual recovery depends on contract terms, invoice volume and the age of prior audits.
What Is Operational Financial Management? A Guide for CFOs and Finance Leaders
The modern CFO is expected to be more than a financial steward; they are expected to be a strategic partner to the business. However, the reality for many finance leaders is that they are bogged down in the tactical details of financial operations.
The promise of data-driven decision-making is lost in a sea of spreadsheets, manual processes, and a fundamental lack of spend visibility. This is the challenge of operational financial management: aligning the day-to-day execution of financial processes with the long-term strategic goals of the organization.
This guide is designed for the strategic CFO who is ready to transform their financial operations from a reactive cost center into a proactive value driver.
We will explore the core principles of operational financial management, dissect the common challenges that stand in the way of financial excellence, and provide a roadmap for implementing the systems and processes needed to achieve true financial governance and control.
Operational vs. Strategic Financial Management
Understanding the distinction between operational and strategic financial management is crucial. While both are essential, they operate on different time horizons and with different objectives.
| Aspect | Strategic Financial Management | Operational Financial Management |
|---|---|---|
| Time Horizon | Long-term (3-5 years) | Short-term (daily, weekly, monthly) |
| Focus | Growth, profitability, capital structure | Liquidity, cash flow, cost control |
| Key Activities | Mergers and acquisitions, capital budgeting, dividend policy | Accounts payable, vendor payments, budgeting |
Operational financial management is the engine that powers your company’s strategic plan. Without effective financial operations, even the most brilliant strategy will fail due to poor execution.
Core Components of Operational Financial Management
A robust operational financial management framework is built on five key pillars:
- Cash Flow and Working Capital Management: Ensuring the business has sufficient liquidity to meet its short-term obligations. This includes managing receivables, payables, and inventory.
- Budgeting and Cost Control: Establishing departmental budgets, monitoring actual spend against those budgets, and implementing financial controls to prevent overspending.
- Accounts Payable and Vendor Payments: Managing the end-to-end process of receiving, approving, and paying vendor invoices accurately and on time.
- Accounts Receivable and Revenue Tracking: Ensuring that customer payments are collected on time to maintain healthy cash flow.
- Financial Reporting and Operational Visibility: Providing timely and accurate financial reporting to give stakeholders a clear view of the company’s performance and financial position.
Common Challenges in Operational Financial Management
Many organizations struggle to achieve excellence in their financial operations due to a common set of challenges:
- Limited Spend Visibility: Without a centralized system for tracking expenses, it is impossible to get a complete picture of where money is being spent, leading to missed savings opportunities and a lack of financial governance.
- Manual and Disconnected Processes: Manual invoice processing, approval routing, and data entry are time-consuming, error-prone, and create bottlenecks in the procure-to-pay cycle.
- Vendor and Contract Complexity: Managing thousands of vendor contracts, service agreements, and pricing structures in spreadsheets is a recipe for overpayments and missed renewal deadlines.
- Risk and Compliance Gaps: Manual processes make it difficult to enforce financial controls and create a clear audit trail, increasing the risk of fraud and non-compliance.
Best Practices for Strengthening Financial Operations
As a CFO, you can drive significant improvements in your company’s operational financial management by focusing on these best practices:
- Centralizing Financial Data: Consolidate all your operational spend data into a single platform to create a single source of truth and enable comprehensive financial reporting.
- Standardizing Workflows and Controls: Implement consistent processes for procurement, invoice approval, and payment across the entire organization to improve efficiency and strengthen financial governance.
- Automating Manual Tasks: Leverage technology to automate repetitive tasks like data entry, invoice validation, and payment scheduling to reduce costs and free up your team for more strategic work.
- Fostering Cross-Department Alignment: Break down silos between finance, procurement, and operations to ensure that financial decisions are made with a full understanding of their operational impact.
The Role of Technology in Modernizing Financial Operations
Technology is a critical enabler of effective operational financial management. A centralized expense management platform like RadiusPoint’s ExpenseLogic provides the tools you need to transform your financial operations.
RadiusPoint helps you:
- Achieve Real-Time Spend Visibility: Gain a complete, up-to-the-minute view of your operational spending across all locations and departments.
- Automate the Procure-to-Pay Cycle: Streamline your entire invoice management process, from receipt to payment, with automated workflows and controls.
- Strengthen Financial Governance: Enforce your financial controls and create a complete audit trail for every transaction.
- Unlock Actionable Insights: Use powerful analytics and reporting to identify cost-saving opportunities and make more informed financial decisions.
By embracing technology and adopting these best practices, you can transform your financial operations from a tactical, back-office function into a strategic asset that drives business value.
If you are ready to take your company’s operational financial management to the next level, contact RadiusPoint today to learn how RadiusPoint can help you achieve your goals.
Why Businesses Conduct Energy Audits and What They Reveal
For most businesses, energy is one of the largest and most unpredictable operating expenses. Utility bills are rising, budget pressure is increasing, and there’s a growing demand for sustainable business practices.
In response, many leaders are asking a critical question: “We know our energy costs are high, but we don’t have clear visibility into our usage.
Where do we even start?”
The answer is an energy audit.
An energy audit is the first and most important step in taking control of your organization’s energy consumption. It’s a systematic review of how, where, and when your business uses energy, and it provides a clear roadmap for reducing costs and improving efficiency.
What Is a Business Energy Audit?
A business energy audit is a comprehensive analysis of your energy consumption and billing data to identify opportunities for cost savings and efficiency improvements. It goes far beyond a simple walkthrough of your facility.
A proper commercial energy assessment involves a detailed examination of your utility invoices, rate structures, and consumption patterns to uncover hidden inefficiencies and billing errors.
The primary purpose of an energy audit is to answer three key questions:
- How much energy is our business using?
- Where are we wasting energy and money?
- What are the most cost-effective ways to reduce our consumption and costs?
Why an Energy Audit Is a Strategic Imperative
Conducting a thorough energy audit is not just an exercise in data collection. It’s a strategic initiative that delivers significant benefits across the entire organization.
Unlock Hidden Cost Savings
This is the most immediate and compelling benefit. A detailed audit can uncover billing errors, identify overcharges, and reveal opportunities to switch to more favorable rate plans. The result is immediate and ongoing cost savings that flow directly to your bottom line.
Boost Operational Efficiency
An energy audit often reveals operational inefficiencies that go beyond energy consumption. By understanding how and when you use energy, you can optimize processes, improve equipment performance, and reduce maintenance costs, leading to a leaner, more efficient operation.
Strengthen ESG and Sustainability Goals
For companies with ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) goals, an energy audit provides the foundational data needed to measure, manage, and report on their environmental impact. It’s a critical first step in any credible sustainability program, providing the verifiable data that stakeholders demand.
The Hidden Hurdles in Conducting an Energy Audit
While the benefits are clear, many businesses struggle to conduct effective energy audits. The challenges are often rooted in the complexity and fragmentation of energy data.
- The Data Deluge: For multi-location businesses, energy data is often scattered across hundreds of PDF invoices from dozens of different utility providers. There is no centralized system to aggregate and analyze this information, making a comprehensive audit nearly impossible.
- The Resource Drain: In-house teams are already stretched thin. They rarely have the time or specialized expertise to conduct a detailed audit of complex utility bills, which are notoriously difficult to decipher.
- The Accuracy Trap: Manual data entry is prone to errors, leading to an inaccurate picture of your energy consumption. Without consistent, reliable data, it’s impossible to benchmark facilities or track the impact of efficiency initiatives.
- The Action Gap: An audit is only as valuable as the actions you take based on its findings. Many businesses lack the resources to implement the recommended changes and track the resulting savings, leaving money on the table.
How Centralized Data Transforms Energy Audits
The solution to these challenges is to centralize your energy data. By automating the collection and processing of your utility invoices, you can create a single source of truth for your energy consumption and costs.
This is where a technology-driven partner like RadiusPoint can make a significant impact.
Our ExpenseLogic platform ingests, processes, and audits all your utility invoices, regardless of the provider or format.
This provides the clean, accurate, and centralized data needed to conduct a thorough and effective energy audit. Instead of spending weeks or months manually collecting data, you can get instant visibility into your energy spend and identify savings opportunities in a fraction of the time.
What Happens After an Energy Audit?
An energy audit is not the end of the journey; it’s the beginning. The audit report will provide a list of recommended actions, from simple operational changes to more significant capital investments.
The next step is to prioritize these actions based on their cost, potential savings, and alignment with your business goals.
This is where a partner like RadiusPoint can provide ongoing support. We not only help you conduct the initial audit, but we also provide the ongoing monitoring and reporting needed to track your progress, measure your savings, and ensure that your energy management program delivers long-term value.
Final Thoughts
In today’s competitive landscape, businesses can no longer afford to treat energy as an uncontrollable expense. An energy audit is the first step in transforming your energy management from a reactive, administrative task into a proactive, strategic discipline.
By leveraging technology and expert support to overcome the common data challenges, you can unlock the full potential of an energy audit and turn valuable insights into measurable bottom-line savings.
Ready to uncover your hidden energy savings?
Contact RadiusPoint today to learn more about our energy audit services.
What is Vendor Governance?
By Sharon Watkins, Founder and CEO, RadiusPoint · 2 September 2026 · 12 min read
Vendor governance is the decision-rights framework that names who may open a BAN, file a dispute, waive an SLA credit, or let a contract auto-renew. It is not a scorecard, and it is not a contract repository. A scorecard tells you how the vendor performed. Governance tells you who was allowed to act when they did not.
KPMG’s 2026 Global Third-Party Risk Management Survey, published 20 March 2026 and covering 851 organizations, found that only 18 percent have TPRM fully integrated with enterprise risk, and only 53 percent call their programs mostly integrated. Just 17 percent rate their TPRM data as fully reliable. RadiusPoint’s job, since 1992, is to feed that framework with invoice-level evidence from ExpenseLogic so a governance meeting has facts, not vendor slides.
This page is the definitional spoke. It does not retell vendor scorecards, which own weighted KPIs. It does not retell multi-vendor support, which owns consolidation versus OEM break-fix. It does not retell vendor contract operations.
Key Takeaways
- Vendor governance names who may act on a vendor. A scorecard names how that vendor scored. They are adjacent jobs, not the same page.
- KPMG’s 2026 survey of 851 organizations found 18 percent full TPRM-ERM integration, 53 percent mostly integrated, and 17 percent fully reliable TPRM data.
- Only 5 percent of those organizations run end-to-end managed TPRM. More than 80 percent outsource pieces. RadiusPoint is a named operator for expense vendors, not a substitute board.
- The expense vendor decision-rights matrix assigns open/close BAN, dispute filing, SLA waiver, auto-renew, and LOA grant to finance, IT or facilities, and a named operator.
- Governance cadence for expense vendors is monthly exceptions, quarterly decision logs, and an annual contract decision. None of those artifacts is a 1-to-5 score.
The Short Version
Vendor governance for telecom and utility spend is a written list of who may act, on what evidence, and how often they meet. If that list does not name a person for disputes, auto-renews, and letters of agency, you have a policy binder, not governance.
In this article
- Vendor governance is decision rights, not a scorecard
- Why do telecom and utility vendors sit outside most governance programs?
- The expense vendor decision-rights matrix
- What cadence should expense-vendor governance actually run on?
- How RadiusPoint’s managed model feeds governance without becoming the board
- Governance versus third-party risk: where the invoices sit
Vendor governance is decision rights, not a scorecard
Vendor governance is the written assignment of who may open a BAN, file a dispute, waive a credit, or allow auto-renew. A scorecard measures billing accuracy, SLA performance, and MACD speed. That measurement page already exists. This page owns the rights that sit above it.
If nobody is allowed to stop an auto-renew, a perfect score still renews a bad deal.
RadiusPoint restates the split because buyers search both terms and land on the same three tabs. Governance is the charter. The scorecard is a report the charter consumes. Multi-vendor support is a third term again: consolidating invoices across carriers, not OEM hardware break-fix. Keep the three URLs apart.
Joey Gyengo, US Third-Party Risk Management Leader at KPMG LLP, put the bar this way: companies chase effectiveness, efficiency, and experience at once, and the work is building a process that is resilient and scalable, not ticking compliance boxes. RadiusPoint agrees. A binder of policies with no named actor on a BAN is a tick.
Why do telecom and utility vendors sit outside most governance programs?
Telecom and utility vendors sit outside most governance programs because they look like high-volume, low-glamour AP, while TPRM budgets chase cyber and regulatory onboarding. That defensive focus leaves the carrier BAN and the vacant meter in accounts payable, where nobody is governing them.
That same KPMG survey lists regulatory compliance as a top driver for 48 percent of respondents and cyber risk for 37 percent.
RadiusPoint has watched that blind spot for decades. A multi-location client paid $1,500 a month, $18,000 a year, on utilities at closed locations. Vacancy cost recovery has cut utility expenses 12 percent in the published case. Those are not cyber findings. They are governance findings that never made the TPRM agenda. Vacant utility cost recovery is the UEM version. Wireless versus TEM is the mobility version of the same miss: a line that TPRM never listed as a third party.
WorldCC still puts post-signature leakage at 11 percent of contract value. Expense vendors are where that 11 percent hides in plain sight, because the invoice arrives every month and looks routine. Governance that only onboards software and cloud vendors has already chosen its exceptions.
The expense vendor decision-rights matrix
The expense vendor decision-rights matrix is RadiusPoint’s five-row assignment of who may act on a BAN, a dispute, a waiver, and a renewal. TPRM guides describe onboarding, risk tiering, and reassessment. They do not name those five expense actions. That matrix is the first information-gain element on this page.
| Decision | Finance | IT / facilities | Named operator |
|---|---|---|---|
| Open or close a BAN | Approves | Requests | Executes in ExpenseLogic |
| File a carrier dispute | Sets the dollar threshold | Provides evidence | Files and ages the case |
| Waive an SLA credit | Signs the waiver | Confirms the outage | Logs the waiver |
| Let a contract auto-renew | Owns the dollar decision | Confirms still needed | Sends or holds notice |
| Issue or revoke an LOA | Countersigns | Scopes systems | Holds the grant log |
A letter of agency without a revoke path is a grant with no governor. TEM onboarding data is how the operator receives the files that make those rows real. If finance “owns vendors” and cannot name who files, the matrix is empty. RadiusPoint will occupy the operator column. You still occupy the waiver and the dollar columns.
What cadence should expense-vendor governance actually run on?
Expense vendor governance should run on three written meeting cadences, and none of those three artifacts is a weighted score. Use a monthly exception huddle, a quarterly decision log, and an annual contract decision. Scorecards already own monthly or quarterly KPI reviews. This cadence owns decisions. That split is the second information-gain element on this page.
Monthly: unmatched invoice lines, missed credits, vacant-site bills, zero-use lines. Artifact: an exception register. Quarterly: who filed, what aged out, which BANs drifted from inventory. Artifact: a decision log. Annual: renew, renegotiate, or terminate with the notice clock in writing. Artifact: a signed decision plus an export. KPMG found that 71 percent of organizations plan further TPRM-ERM integration over three years. Planning is not a meeting. A monthly register is.
An invoice audit feeds the monthly huddle. Invoice auditing services are how RadiusPoint staffs it. The four TEM benefits page owns the program case. This page owns how often the people in the matrix actually sit down.
How RadiusPoint’s managed model feeds governance without becoming the board
RadiusPoint feeds vendor governance with invoice evidence, dispute files, and inventory, and it never takes the client’s own board seat. Finance still signs waivers. You still own auto-renew. RadiusPoint is the named operator for telecom, utility, and wireless expense vendors.
KPMG found that more than 80 percent of organizations use managed services or outsourcing for some TPRM work, but only 5 percent have adopted an end-to-end managed model. ExpenseLogic is the evidence pack. RadiusPoint analysts audit lines, file disputes, and keep inventory current. A Fortune 100 manufacturer recovered $450,000 in telecom refunds in year one, with $850,000 in ongoing annual savings and a $1.3 million year-one impact. A food service client cut mobility cost 22 percent and more than $400,000 in year one on 600-plus lines. Inventory work recovered $174,000 in re-credits. Those dollars show up in a governance pack as cases, not as a slide that says “we manage vendors.”
The commercial pages are telecom expense management, Utility Expense Management (UEM), and managed mobility services. Vendor evaluation is the buyer’s companion. This page is the charter those services report into.
Governance versus third-party risk: where the invoices sit
Third-party risk management onboards and tiers vendors for cyber, privacy, and continuity, which is a different job from expense-vendor governance. Vendor governance for expense spend decides who may spend, dispute, and renew once that vendor is already inside the building.
KPMG’s 851-organization sample is the current public bar: 18 percent full integration, 17 percent fully reliable data, 5 percent end-to-end managed. RadiusPoint does not claim to replace TPRM. It claims to put invoices on the table TPRM usually skips.
RadiusPoint is ISO 9001 certified since 2002. Amalgam Insights named RadiusPoint a Distinguished Vendor on the 2024 TEM Vendor SmartList. The Capterra listing sat at 4.8 from 31 reviews through December 2025. The capability statement and about page carry firm facts. Organizations implementing TEM typically see 15 to 30 percent cost reduction in year one. That is a hedged category range, not a RadiusPoint guarantee.
ESG reporting has eliminated 800 man-hours of data gathering in the published RadiusPoint case. That is a governance output, not a TPRM questionnaire. Why you need a managed mobility provider is the wireless staffing argument. This page is the rights argument that has to exist before that staff acts.
How we researched this
We fetched the live RadiusPoint vendor-governance page on 2 September 2026 and compared it with TPRM explainers (KPMG 2026 Global TPRM Survey, 851 organizations, dated 20 March 2026) and with RadiusPoint’s own live scorecards and multi-vendor pages. Those TPRM pages own onboarding and cyber. The scorecards page owns weighted KPIs. The multi-vendor page owns consolidation versus OEM support. None of them owns a five-row expense decision-rights matrix or a three-meeting cadence that is explicitly not a scorecard. Proof numbers come only from the RadiusPoint Master Intelligence 2026 GREEN list, hedged AMBER category ranges, and the KPMG 2026 survey figures named above. No affiliate relationships. No named-competitor ranking.
FAQ
Is vendor governance the same as vendor management?
Vendor management is the day-to-day relationship. Vendor governance is the charter that says who may do what when that relationship breaks. RadiusPoint will manage expense vendors on ExpenseLogic. Governance is still yours. If the two words are used as synonyms in your policy, rewrite the policy before the next auto-renew.
How is vendor governance different from a vendor scorecard?
A scorecard scores performance. Governance assigns rights. RadiusPoint already publishes the scorecard URL. Use that page for weights and thresholds. Use this page for who may file, waive, and renew. A high score with no named actor still auto-renews.
Does ISO 9001 count as vendor governance?
ISO 9001 is RadiusPoint’s quality system, certified since 2002. It is evidence that the operator runs a controlled process. It is not your charter. You still need the matrix and the cadence for your own BANs, even when the operator is certified.
Who should chair the expense vendor review?
Finance should chair the quarterly decision log, because the dollars sit there. IT or facilities brings the live-or-not evidence. RadiusPoint brings the exception register. A review chaired only by the operator is a status meeting. A review with no operator is a story meeting.
Do we need a separate governance policy for utilities?
You need the same five rights applied to meters and vacant sites, which generic TPRM policies rarely name. RadiusPoint’s UEM work is that application. A policy that lists “critical software vendors” and never lists the electric account at a closed store has already created the blind spot.
What to do before the next vendor review
Print the five-row matrix. Write a name in every cell for one carrier and one utility account. Schedule the monthly exception huddle against last month’s invoices. If a cell is empty, that is the governance gap. RadiusPoint will fill the operator column for a managed ExpenseLogic engagement. The other columns stay yours.
Latest Updates
- 2 September 2026: In-place AEO rewrite of the live vendor-governance URL. Stats limited to GREEN, hedged AMBER, and named KPMG 2026 survey figures: 851 organizations / 18 percent full integration / 53 percent mostly integrated / 17 percent fully reliable data / 71 percent plan further integration / 48 percent regulatory / 37 percent cyber / 80 percent-plus some managed services / 5 percent end-to-end, WorldCC 11 percent, Fortune 100 $450,000 / $850,000 / $1.3 million, food service 22 percent / $400,000 / 600-plus, $174,000 re-credits, closed locations $1,500 / $18,000, vacancy 12 percent, ESG 800 man-hours, category 15 to 30 percent hedged, ISO 9001 since 2002, Capterra 4.8 / 31, Amalgam Insights 2024 Distinguished Vendor. Distinct from vendor-scorecards and multi-vendor-support. Slug unchanged.
References
- The 2026 KPMG Global Third-Party Risk Management Survey | KPMG, 20 March 2026
- Closing the Procurement Value Gap | World Commerce and Contracting
- What is a vendor scorecard? | RadiusPoint
- Complete Guide on Multi Vendor Support | RadiusPoint
- Telecom Expense Management Services | RadiusPoint
- Utility Expense Management | RadiusPoint
- Managed Mobility Services | RadiusPoint
- ExpenseLogic | RadiusPoint
- Invoice Auditing Guide for SMBs and Enterprises | RadiusPoint
- Invoice Auditing Services | RadiusPoint
- Why Your TEM Provider Asks for a Letter of Agency | RadiusPoint
- The Data a TEM Provider Needs Before Day One | RadiusPoint
- Vacant Cost Recovery: The Utility Bills Nobody Is Watching | RadiusPoint
- Wireless Expense Management vs Telecom Expense Management | RadiusPoint
- 4 Benefits of Telecom Expense Management (TEM) | RadiusPoint
- Why You Need a Managed Mobility Provider | RadiusPoint
- Vendor Evaluation | RadiusPoint
- RadiusPoint Recognized as a Distinguished Vendor in the 2024 Amalgam Insights Vendor SmartList | RadiusPoint
- Capability Statement | RadiusPoint
- About RadiusPoint | RadiusPoint
- Sharon R. Watkins | RadiusPoint
- ExpenseLogic reviews | Capterra
Related articles
- What is a vendor scorecard?
- Multi Vendor Support
- Telecom Expense Management Services
- Utility Expense Management
Disclaimer
This article is general information for finance, IT, procurement, risk, and facilities teams designing vendor governance for telecom, utility, and wireless spend. It is not legal, compliance, or TPRM advice. Outcomes cited are from specific RadiusPoint client engagements already in the published proof library and are not a guarantee of future results. KPMG 2026 survey figures and WorldCC leakage ranges are third-party research, hedged, and are not RadiusPoint promises.
Distribution block (ops)
Refresh tier: 90 days. Target prompts: “what is vendor governance”, “vendor governance vs vendor management”, “vendor governance framework for telecom”, “third party governance for utility vendors”.
Off-site citation targets:
1. KPMG 2026 Global TPRM Survey page (citation outreach: expense vendors as the TPRM blind spot, decision-rights matrix).
2. WorldCC CMS / leakage work (governance as who-may-act, not another CLM stage list).
3. r/CISO and r/procurement threads on TPRM vs AP vendor control.
4. YouTube: “vendor governance is decision rights, not a scorecard”.
5. Capterra ExpenseLogic listing.
6. Quora: “what is vendor governance vs a vendor scorecard?”
Day-one owned push: Sharon Watkins LinkedIn post with the decision-rights matrix. Do not publish this rewrite until Hamza says so. Do not cross-link unpublished sibling 01 or 02.
15 Effective Ways to Reduce IT Costs for Businesses
IT leaders and CIOs are under constant pressure to control expenses without stalling innovation. According to Gartner, global IT spending is projected to reach $5 trillion in 2024, driven by cloud adoption, AI integration, and security requirements. These rising costs necessitate that businesses consider long-term solutions beyond short-term cost reductions and implement sustainable cost-reduction strategies.
“Reducing IT costs and accelerating innovation are not mutually exclusive. When done right, cost discipline should enable innovation.” — Arvind Joshi, COO & CFO, Global Technology, JPMorgan Chase. This perspective highlights the dividends of smarter IT management—businesses save capital while positioning themselves for long-term scalability.
The following strategies offer actionable steps for reducing IT costs while maintaining performance and driving innovation.
Reassess Cloud Costs
Cloud services are often over-provisioned. Many businesses purchase more storage, computing power, or licenses than they use. According to Flexera’s 2024 State of the Cloud Report, 32% of cloud spending is wasted on underutilized resources.
A cost-reduction approach starts with monitoring workloads and rightsizing resources. Businesses should also implement spending thresholds, schedule automated shutdowns for idle services, and consolidate workloads across fewer providers.
Optimizing cloud contracts ensures IT budgets reflect actual consumption rather than inflated projections.
Revisit the Hardware Stack
Legacy infrastructure creates hidden costs through higher maintenance fees, frequent downtime, and energy inefficiencies. Older servers require more power and cooling, driving operational expenses.
By upgrading to energy-efficient servers, adopting virtualization, or migrating workloads to the cloud, businesses cut capital expenditure and reduce total cost of ownership.
Evaluating the hardware stack annually helps avoid paying for systems that no longer align with operational needs.
Recheck Project Portfolio
IT teams often juggle multiple projects, but not all deliver measurable returns. Projects with low adoption, unclear objectives, or outdated outcomes drain budgets and staff hours.
Portfolio rationalization means pausing, combining, or retiring projects that no longer align with business objectives.
CIOs should prioritize high-value initiatives that contribute directly to growth, security, or customer experience. This reduces cost leakage while ensuring resources are directed toward innovation.
Move Toward Consumption-Based Contracts
Paying for fixed resources leads to inefficiencies. A consumption-based model, often called pay-as-you-go, allows businesses to pay only for the services they actively use. This approach applies to cloud storage, networking, and even software licensing.
Consumption-based contracts reduce the risk of over-committing and allow IT budgets to flex with real demand. Businesses that shift to this model improve cost predictability and align IT spend with revenue cycles.
Realign IT Support Models
Traditional support agreements charge a flat fee for comprehensive services, but many organizations only need partial coverage. A tiered or remote-first support model helps businesses match costs with actual needs.
Shared-service arrangements or managed service providers also reduce internal labor costs while ensuring expert coverage. Realigning support saves money without compromising uptime or reliability.
Optimize Sourcing Strategies
Vendor sourcing directly impacts IT budgets. Relying on a single vendor may limit negotiation power, while managing too many suppliers creates administrative overhead.
A balanced approach, through competitive bidding or hybrid sourcing, drives cost savings while maintaining service quality. Regular sourcing reviews ensure that vendor relationships remain aligned with pricing trends and technology requirements.
Align Sourcing With Business Objectives
Sourcing decisions should extend beyond price comparisons. Vendors tied to strategic outcomes deliver more value than those based on transactional contracts. Value-based sourcing includes service-level agreements tied to performance, efficiency, or customer satisfaction metrics.
This alignment eliminates unnecessary spending on misaligned services and promotes stronger accountability across vendor partnerships.
Audit All Existing Contracts
Many businesses continue paying for outdated or overlapping contracts because renewals are automated or unnoticed. Quarterly or biannual audits uncover these inefficiencies.
Auditing ensures that subscription software, cloud services, and telecom contracts reflect current business requirements. Terminating redundant agreements or consolidating providers often leads to substantial savings.
Conduct Application Rationalization
Maintaining redundant applications is one of the most common sources of IT waste. Licensing fees, integration costs, and staff training expenses multiply when multiple tools serve the same function.
Rationalizing applications, by consolidating into a single enterprise suite or reducing overlapping platforms, lowers costs and simplifies management. For example, replacing multiple collaboration tools with a single enterprise system reduces both licensing and support expenditures.
Embrace IT Automation
Automation removes repetitive tasks such as system patching, user provisioning, monitoring, and incident response. Beyond cost savings, automation improves accuracy and reduces downtime.
Automated IT processes allow staff to focus on higher-value initiatives like digital transformation or customer service enhancements. Over time, automation produces measurable reductions in labor and operational overhead.
Adopt Expense Management Software
Expense management software provides visibility into IT, telecom, and utility costs. Platforms like RadiusPoint’s expense management solution centralize expense tracking, generate detailed reports, and identify inefficiencies.
By implementing such solutions, businesses prevent billing errors, optimize vendor contracts, and streamline payment processes. Data-driven insights transform expense management into a proactive cost-control function.
Reduce, Don’t Freeze IT Spending
Freezing IT budgets is a short-term reaction that stifles innovation. Instead, businesses should reduce expenses strategically by cutting non-essential services while continuing to fund critical areas such as cybersecurity, cloud modernization, and automation.
This approach safeguards innovation pipelines while still achieving meaningful cost reductions.
Improve IT Cash Flow Strategies
Cash flow management improves financial flexibility. Options include leasing hardware instead of purchasing outright, adopting subscription-based models, or extending payment schedules.
Shifting from large capital expenses (CAPEX) to predictable operating expenses (OPEX) ensures budgets remain balanced while meeting technology requirements.
Renegotiate Vendor Contracts
Vendors are often open to renegotiation when presented with alternatives. Businesses reduce costs by consolidating purchases, extending contract terms, or negotiating discounts.
Regular renegotiations not only cut immediate expenses but also establish stronger vendor accountability. Preparing benchmarks before discussions helps CIOs secure more favorable terms.
Implement IT Asset Lifecycle Management
Unmanaged IT assets lead to unnecessary purchases and lost efficiency. Lifecycle management ensures assets are monitored from procurement to retirement.
Strategies include redeploying underutilized devices internally, extending device lifespans with proper maintenance, and scheduling structured decommissioning. This approach maximizes asset value while avoiding redundant expenditures.
Strengthen Governance and Cost Transparency
Governance frameworks help create accountability for IT spending. Regular reporting at the department or project level builds transparency and ensures that budgets align with corporate strategy.
Cost transparency fosters informed decision-making, enabling CIOs to make adjustments before costs spiral out of control.
Final Thoughts
Reducing IT costs is not about cutting corners—it is about creating efficiency, accountability, and resilience. CIOs and business leaders who reassess contracts, rationalize applications, adopt automation, and leverage expense management software position their organizations for both savings and scalability.
As Arvind Joshi of JPMorgan Chase noted, cost discipline and innovation go hand in hand. By treating cost optimization as a continuous process rather than a one-time initiative, businesses strengthen their financial health while keeping technology aligned with long-term growth.
Utilization Management in Healthcare: Clinical Review vs. IT and Telecom Asset Utilization
“Utilization management” in healthcare most often means the clinical review process, prior authorization, concurrent review and retrospective review, that determines whether a medical service was necessary. A separate and unrelated use of the term covers IT, telecom and device utilization management: tracking whether the phones, tablets, circuits and connected equipment a hospital system pays for every month are actually being used. This page covers both, briefly and accurately, and focuses on the second.
Important Points Explained Ahead
- Clinical utilization management (prior authorization, concurrent and retrospective review) is a distinct regulatory and clinical discipline governed by CMS, NCQA and HIPAA. RadiusPoint does not provide clinical UM software.
- IT and telecom utilization management tracks whether devices, lines and circuits a healthcare system is paying for are actually in use, which is where RadiusPoint’s expense management work fits.
- Hospital systems commonly carry wireless lines, tablets and IT assets assigned to employees or departments that no longer exist, still billing every month.
- RadiusPoint’s healthcare clients have recovered an average of 26% in telecom expense reductions through multi-site auditing and centralized management, driven by finding exactly this kind of unused, still-billing asset.
- The two disciplines are easy to confuse because they share a name. They do not share a data source, a regulatory framework, or a vendor category.
Short version: if you are researching prior authorization and clinical review, the sections below on process and regulation cover it. If you are trying to find out why your hospital system’s telecom and IT bills do not match actual device usage, skip to the ExpenseLogic section.
What Clinical Utilization Management Covers
Clinical utilization management is a structured, data-driven process that health plans, hospitals and insurers use to evaluate the necessity and appropriateness of medical services before, during or after they are delivered. It operates across three phases: prospective review before treatment, concurrent review during hospitalization, and retrospective review after care is complete.
The process is governed by CMS rules on medically necessary services under Medicare and Medicaid, NCQA accreditation standards requiring timely authorization and appeal protocols, and HIPAA requirements for handling protected health information during review. U.S. healthcare spending reached roughly $4.87 trillion in 2023, and a meaningful share of that growth is tied to increased utilization, which is the cost pressure clinical UM programs exist to manage. Physician-reported burden from prior authorization is well documented in AMA surveys, and this is genuinely difficult, high-stakes work that sits entirely outside expense management.
Why RadiusPoint Does Not Offer Clinical Utilization Management
RadiusPoint is a telecom, utility and IT expense management firm, not a clinical software or managed care organization, so a claim of clinical UM capability would misrepresent what the company actually does. This distinction matters to anyone researching the term, because the two disciplines require entirely different vendors, data sources and regulatory expertise.
Where RadiusPoint’s healthcare work does intersect with the word “utilization” is on the operational side: whether the wireless lines, tablets, IT assets and connected devices a hospital system pays for every month are actually being used by anyone, and whether telecom and utility billing across every facility reflects what is contractually owed. That is a cost and asset question, not a clinical one, and it is where the rest of this page focuses.
What IT and Telecom Utilization Management Actually Tracks
IT and telecom utilization management in a healthcare setting measures whether billed devices, lines and services correspond to active, in-use assets across every facility. Hospital systems accumulate wireless lines, tablets, nurse call devices and IT assets across departments and locations faster than they retire them, and billing rarely catches up automatically when a device stops being used.
| Metric | What it flags |
|---|---|
| Zero-use wireless lines | Devices assigned to employees who left or departments that were consolidated |
| Duplicate device assignments | Multiple active lines billed to the same employee or role |
| Vacant-site utility and telecom billing | Closed clinics or wings still generating monthly charges |
| Underused data plans | Circuits and plans billed above actual usage volume |
Why This Matters More in Healthcare Than Other Industries
Healthcare organizations turn over devices and assign lines faster than most industries because staffing changes constantly across shifts, departments and facilities, which makes zero-use billing easier to accumulate and harder to catch manually. A multi-site hospital system with dozens of facilities, each provisioning its own wireless devices and IT assets, creates exactly the fragmented visibility problem that lets unused billing persist for years.
The financial impact compounds because healthcare telecom and IT spend typically flows through the same accounts payable process as clinical vendor invoices, so a zero-use device line looks identical to a legitimate charge unless someone reconciles it against an actual employee and asset roster.
How RadiusPoint Audits IT and Telecom Utilization in Healthcare
RadiusPoint’s ExpenseLogic platform reconciles telecom, IT and utility invoices against a real inventory of employees, devices and facilities, rather than relying on the vendor’s own billing records as the source of truth. This is the same line-item audit approach applied across telecom expense management engagements generally, adapted to the multi-site, high-turnover reality of hospital systems.
RadiusPoint’s healthcare clients have recovered an average of 26% in telecom expense reductions through this kind of multi-site oversight and centralized management. The savings come from auditing what vendors are actually billing against what the organization should be paying, not from renegotiating contracts. The same pattern shows up in utility expense management: when a clinic or wing closes, utility accounts frequently stay active and keep generating charges until someone specifically audits for it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does RadiusPoint provide clinical utilization management software?
No. RadiusPoint provides telecom, utility and IT expense management. Clinical utilization management, prior authorization, and medical necessity review require a managed care or clinical software vendor, not an expense management firm.
Why do these two things share the same name?
“Utilization” simply means usage, and both disciplines measure whether something (a medical service or a billed device) was actually used as intended. Beyond the shared word, they do not overlap in process, data, or regulation.
Can IT and telecom utilization audits find savings even without a full expense management contract?
A one-time audit can surface zero-use lines and vacant-site billing, but the savings tend to reappear within a year or two without ongoing monthly review, since staff and device turnover is constant in a hospital system.
How is this different from a standard telecom audit?
A telecom audit checks billing accuracy against contract terms. Utilization review specifically checks whether a billed device or line has any active usage at all, which is a narrower but often higher-yield question in healthcare, where turnover creates zero-use assets faster than billing errors accumulate.
How We Researched This
The clinical utilization management section draws on publicly available guidance from CMS, NCQA and AMA research on prior authorization burden. The IT and telecom utilization section draws on RadiusPoint’s own client engagement data across healthcare expense management since 1992. This page was reviewed by Sharon Watkins, RadiusPoint’s founder and CEO.
Latest Updates
August 28, 2026: Rewritten to disambiguate clinical utilization management from IT and telecom asset utilization management, and to remove a prior claim that RadiusPoint provides clinical UM automation, which it does not.
References
- CMS, coverage and medical necessity rules under Medicare and Medicaid
- NCQA, utilization management accreditation standards
- American Medical Association, prior authorization physician survey data
- RadiusPoint client engagement data, healthcare telecom and utility expense management, 1992 to present
Related Articles
This page provides general information about clinical utilization management for reference purposes only and is not clinical, regulatory or legal guidance. RadiusPoint does not provide clinical utilization management, prior authorization, or medical necessity review services.
Waste Services Case Study: 28% Reduction in Trash Spend
28% Reduction in Trash Spend
Trimming expenses on waste management serves as the initial step in an organization’s sustainability journey. A prominent elevator company operating worldwide successfully slashed its monthly waste expenditure by 28%. Additionally, by securing a corporate contract, they paved the way for greater savings across their new locations, fortifying their commitment to sustainability.
Issues
Our client grappled with numerous challenges in its billing and services. Upon conducting an initial review, it became evident that over 40 locations had individually inked contracts with local waste haulers. Consequently, these contracts staggered in expiration, often incurring hefty early termination fees. This complexity rendered negotiating a unified corporate contract unfeasible within the initial twelve months of gaining contract and service visibility.
Solution
To tackle these issues, the organization teamed up with RadiusPoint. Collaborating on bill processing and payment services for their monthly waste invoices, RadiusPoint unearthed a route toward cost reduction during the standard optimization process.
RadiusPoint’s optimization process delved into scrutinizing services provided by the existing vendor, aiming to uncover contractual obligations and service specifics. Numerous locations had ordered services sporadically without considering contract terms, bin sizes, or pickup frequency. RadiusPoint conducted a comprehensive analysis across the organization, tailoring services to match the office types and specific service requirements to ensure an appropriate fit.
During our inventory and audit of the waste services, RadiusPoint:
- Obtained a copy of the vendor’s current contract.
- Validated the contract rates against the current invoice.
- Compared services across all sites for any anomalies.
- Identified overage charges or other charges beyond the normal pick-up charges.
- Identified better rates for those locations not under contract.
- Identified better rates and possible early termination penalties, if applicable, for those locations under contract
- Recommend service changes to eliminate overage charges.
- Provided consolidated report for Request for Proposal (RFP).
- Provided analysis once RFP is returned to show savings.
- Assisted with contract negotiations for each contract or global contract.
- Managed the transition project.
- Assisted with issues that arose at the location during the term of the agreement.
Results
Partnering with RadiusPoint empowered the client to leverage our exclusive software, ExpenseLogic. This tool facilitated the seamless processing and payment of monthly invoices while concurrently conducting an audit to guarantee precise billing per contracted rates. This meticulous approach culminated in an impressive 28% decrease in monthly waste expenses. Embracing transparency in management paves the way for astute business choices, fostering cost-effectiveness, operational efficiency, and the achievement of sustainability objectives. Entrust RadiusPoint to guide you toward attaining your business savings targets, specifically with your waste services.
Healthcare Case Study: Telecom Expenses Down by 26% in Healthcare
Reducing Telecom Expenses by 26% in Healthcare
RadiusPoint collaborated with an Assisted Living and Nursing Home organization to enhance their oversight of telecom, IT, and wireless expenses. Serving as their telecom expense management (TEM) partner, RadiusPoint offered comprehensive insight into their invoices and spending and the range of services and equipment deployed across each site. This detailed visibility enabled RadiusPoint to identify and deactivate over 700 dormant business lines at various locations leading to a 26% reduction of their annual spend or $475k once the lines were disconnected and removed from the invoices.
Background
Given the healthcare industry’s focus on emergency preparedness, there’s a constant demand for reliable access to emergency personnel. Landlines play a critical role in ensuring immediate response in case of facility emergencies. Each location is mandated to have two copper lines for direct fire notification, with the option to add more lines for direct point-to-point access to the fire department. Safety for patients and staff is the top priority for this organization, necessitating RadiusPoint to meticulously validate vendor-provided information at every site.
Issues
The organization lacked previous inventory and audits of its telecom, IT, and wireless services. The service introduced detailed identification of each service type on vendor invoices, outlining all features, fees, taxes, and surcharges billed for each phone number. Various telecom vendors used different billing formats, with some providing only the total amount due without specific service descriptions or associated phone numbers. This limited visibility hindered effective decision-making regarding service removal or cost reduction through optimization.
As the costs of regular business lines escalated with vendors, the organization faced pressure to cut expenses. However, stringent regulations and safety protocols concerning patient well-being posed a challenge. Over the past two years, regular business line costs surged significantly, soaring from $50.00 to over $200.00 per line. Although newer, more cost-effective technology existed, regulatory restrictions prevented its use for regular business lines, prioritizing security measures.
Solution
RadiusPoint conducted an audit and inventory, yielding crucial information for eliminating unnecessary lines. This initiative validated services and phone lines across all sites, uncovering errors and overcharges in invoices. Some invoices continued to bill for services canceled years ago, obscured by invoice complexity or consolidation. RadiusPoint’s scrutiny pinpointed erroneous charges like features and taxes on phone lines canceled five years prior, prompting requests for credits from the vendor. In one case, even after an account was disconnected, circuits associated with it continued to bill due to a failed disconnection request.
The inventory and audit process began by verifying each phone line’s use through multiple calls and on-site visits for lines without responses. This process revealed over 700 unused regular business lines, some unconnected even in the phone rooms at various locations. Additionally, RadiusPoint offered recommendations to reduce line counts and optimize necessary lines. This enhanced visibility into remaining monthly expenses, enabling contract negotiations with vendors, and resulting in a further 10% cost reduction.
Results
Now equipped with ExpenseLogic, RadiusPoint’s proprietary software, this organization possesses comprehensive visibility into its telecom invoices and a complete inventory management system. In the Site Manager section of ExpenseLogic, a single click grants their team access to detailed invoice images, individual phone lines, circuits, wireless numbers, service features, and monthly costs for each location. Their annual savings exceeding $500k, alongside the elimination of 700 unnecessary lines, have led to reduced costs, improved services, and heightened accuracy in their monthly telecom billing.
Streamlining Utility Expense Management with Expense Software
Utility expense management software automates data capture, monitors usage in real time, integrates directly with utility providers, enforces spending policy, and generates the customized reporting finance teams need to act on utility spend rather than just record it. The complexity of utility billing, fluctuating rates, meter-level tracking across dozens of locations, is exactly what makes manual UEM slow and error-prone at any real scale.
Important Points Explained Ahead
- Manual utility expense tracking is both time-consuming and error-prone, which is why automated data capture is the first capability worth evaluating in any UEM software.
- Real-time monitoring surfaces usage anomalies, like a vacant-site meter still running, fast enough to act on rather than discovering it a quarter later.
- Direct integration with utility providers matters more than generic dashboard features, since it is what lets a platform reconcile invoices against actual billing data automatically.
- Scalability is not optional. Utility expense grows with location count, and software that cannot scale with it becomes the bottleneck it was meant to remove.
- ExpenseLogic ties utility invoice data, meter-level usage and rate classification together in one platform, which is what makes vacant-cost recovery and rate reclassification findings possible in the first place.
Short version: the features that matter in UEM software are the ones that turn utility data into an action, a caught error, a disconnected meter, a reclassified rate, not just a dashboard that looks organized.
Why Utility Expense Management Is Harder Than It Looks
Utility expenses pose a distinct challenge because rates fluctuate, billing cycles vary by provider, and tracking has to happen at the meter level across every location, not just at the company level. Manually managing that volume of detail consumes real time and introduces errors that compound the more locations an organization operates.
Expense management software built specifically for UEM has become close to essential for organizations trying to optimize this process, since it replaces manual reconciliation with a system built to hold and cross-reference that level of detail automatically.
What UEM Software Actually Needs to Do
| Capability | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| Automated data capture | Removes manual entry error and keeps utility data current without staff time spent re-keying invoices |
| Real-time monitoring | Surfaces usage anomalies, like a vacant-site meter still running, while they are still cheap to fix |
| Utility provider integration | Enables direct invoice reconciliation instead of manual cross-checking against provider portals |
| Policy enforcement | Keeps utility spend aligned to organizational guidelines rather than drifting location by location |
| Customized reporting and analytics | Turns raw usage data into decisions finance and facilities teams can actually act on |
| Scalability | Keeps pace as location count and utility spend grow, rather than becoming a bottleneck at scale |
Where Automation Finds Money, Not Just Data
Automated data capture and real-time monitoring only pay for themselves when they lead to an action, a disconnected meter, a corrected rate class, a resolved billing error, rather than sitting in a dashboard nobody checks. The value of UEM software is not the volume of data it displays, it is how directly that data connects to a specific dollar figure someone can recover or stop paying.
Streamlined approval workflows and mobile accessibility matter operationally, but they support the core function rather than replace it: a fast approval process for a bill that was never checked against contract terms just moves the error through the system faster, it does not catch it.
How ExpenseLogic Applies This to Utility Expense Management
ExpenseLogic ties invoice data, meter-level usage and rate classification together in one platform built specifically for utility expense management, rather than a general-purpose expense tool adapted to utility billing after the fact. That connection is what makes specific findings possible: vacant cost recovery, catching meters still billing at closed locations, and utility rate reclassification both depend on cross-referencing invoice, meter and account status data automatically rather than reviewing each one separately.
Real-time monitoring inside ExpenseLogic surfaces the same usage anomalies described above, fast enough for a facilities or finance team to act before a quarter of wasted spend accumulates. To see how this applies to a specific utility portfolio, request a demonstration.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the single most valuable feature in UEM software?
Direct integration with utility providers, since it is what makes automated invoice reconciliation possible. Dashboards and reporting are only as good as the underlying data feeding them.
How does UEM software find vacant-site billing specifically?
By cross-referencing active meter and account status against a facility or location roster, so a meter still billing at a location marked closed or vacant surfaces as a specific, actionable finding rather than a line lost in a general invoice review.
Does UEM software replace the need for a human audit?
No. Software surfaces the anomalies and automates data capture; a human review still confirms findings, especially before disputing a charge with a utility provider. The software makes the review faster and more complete, not unnecessary.
How long does it take to see ROI from UEM software?
Initial findings, like vacant-site billing or rate misclassification, typically surface within the first 60 to 90 days of implementation, once invoice and meter data are fully loaded and cross-referenced.
How We Researched This
This page draws on RadiusPoint’s own ExpenseLogic platform capabilities and client engagement data across utility expense management since 1992. It was reviewed by Sharon Watkins, RadiusPoint’s founder and CEO.
Latest Updates
August 28, 2026: Rewritten to add the RadiusPoint/ExpenseLogic tie-in that was missing from the prior version of this page, along with an Important Points Explained Ahead summary and FAQ.
References
- RadiusPoint client engagement data, utility expense management software applications, 1992 to present
Related Articles
- Utility Expense Management
- ExpenseLogic
- Vacant Cost Recovery
- Utility Rate Reclassification
- Request a Demonstration
Capabilities described reflect RadiusPoint’s ExpenseLogic platform. Results depend on invoice volume, meter count and data completeness at implementation.
Deep Dive Eliminates Telephone Overcharges
Most organizations with multiple locations will have many telephone vendors that they must deal with daily. Each Telecom vendor will have different service offerings that will create confusion and ambiguous monthly invoices.
How do you keep your organization from overpaying for your services or having the wrong ones in place at each location?
Organizations require telecom services at each location for several reasons:
- Regulatory – fire alarm and elevator lines
- Security – alarm lines for the security system
- Order Management – Point of Sale (POS) over data circuits
- Customer Access – Direct Lines to departments for customers
- Connectivity for location to corporate – Data circuits
- Long distance – Connecting the location to the outside world for long-distance calls
- Wireless Service – Wireless devices for employees
These services will be provided by multiple vendors, which means that there will be multiple invoices for each location, each month. Identifying the best vendor with the best rates is not the beginning of the quest to eliminate overcharges. The beginning is the deep dive that is required to identify what services are already in place and how those services are used.
Most organizations have specific telephone needs that require circuits and copper lines for each location. Keeping up with the circuit numbers, each copper line phone number, and what it is used for is a cumbersome task.
For one retailer, not ensuring that services and equipment were properly cataloged and monitored created an embarrassing situation for the telecom and IT team and overcharges of over $62k paid needlessly by the retailer.
Retailers must have telephone numbers that allow a patron to call a specific department such as men’s shoes or children’s clothing. To have this type of service a retailer needs to have direct lines to each department.
Keeping an inventory of the circuits and phone numbers may have identified that the services were not canceled when the location closed. The other issue that created this overcharge situation was the ambiguous invoice from the telephone vendor.
The billing did not break down the services with enough detail to allow the telecom and IT team to realize that when they requested the services to be disconnected, not all services were disconnected. This oversight caused a 2 year overpayment period of $62k.
So, beyond the obvious of making sure your company is not overpaying for services, why is this deep dive needed?
In the Telecom industry, this deep dive is referred to as an inventory and audit of the telecom and IT services. This inventory and audit should create a baseline of service types, costs, contracts, and invoices.
It should also validate what services you have, the location address, and the department or personnel using the services. Identifying errors, overcharges and inefficiencies in your environment will bring the entire process together to cut costs and increase efficiency.
Having this information detailed by location would have saved this retailer over $60k because when the services were no longer needed and a disconnect request was made, it would have been quickly identified that the services continued to bill.
Identifying the right partner to work with to perform the inventory and audit is a must. There are many organizations that will “audit” your telephone invoices, some only charging for a portion of the savings however, defining exactly what will be audited and what the deliverables should be the first questions asked of your potential partner.
If you need this deep dive to identify very detailed information about your current telecom environment, you will most likely not receive that with a contingency-based model as often these are quick looks at the services to identify the low-hanging fruit.
The deep dive needed to specifically identify all services and their purpose will need to be performed by a project-based company that defines the deliverables with multiple steps and a very detailed work product.
Identifying the information that will be included in the inventory and audit is one of the first steps in gathering the information required and a timeline that will produce cost-saving results. One of the most frequent inventory and audits performed is for copper lines or Plain Old Telephone System (POTS) lines.
These lines are often required for businesses for alarm or elevator lines. Several years ago, this was the best and most cost-effective solution, however, innovation has created new types of services that work better and are much more cost-effective.
A business can transition over to these new services. However, if you do not have an inventory of all of your current services and phone lines, you run the risk of not disconnecting all of the POTS lines and you will keep paying for them.
A recent inventory and audit identified over 600 POTS phone lines that should have been canceled years before, however, the locations continued to pay for the lines because they had no idea the lines still existed.
The services had moved to a more modern service at a much lower cost, but the telecom team performing the work did not realize that the lines continued to bill. This oversight cost this company over $30k per month.
How can your chosen partner prevent this type of oversight from occurring? Identifying all the current services is the best place to start by ensuring that you’re only paying for what you need.
A successful project consists of a framework for managing fixed telecom environments that focuses on people, processes, and tools/technology. The inventory and audit establish a contract, invoice, service detail, and cost baseline.
The visibility gained through the project supports technology selection, budgeting, contract negotiations, vendor relationships, change management, and other integral telecom activities.
What type of information is needed to complete an inventory and audit?
- Location address
- Service contracts
- Invoices
- Customer Service Records
- Organizational information
- Service ordering process
Identifying the services and lines or circuits is one of the most important areas of the project as this is where most of the hidden services are found. Ensuring that an organization is only paying for the services that they want, and need is an integral part of the process and can uncover thousands in savings.
During an inventory and audit for an auto parts after-market organization, it was uncovered that there were 25 toll-free lines billing long-distance calls however the lines did not belong to them.
The lines were billed through the long-distance carrier and were on an invoice that was billed monthly; however, the total invoice cost was over $500k monthly and was more than 1,000 pages in length.
The only way this type of overcharge is identified is by calling each phone line to ask who the line belongs to. Once this occurred, the lines were moved from the organization’s account, saving them $10k per month.
Verifying ownership of the services is the first part of the process and once the services are verified as belonging to your organization, it is necessary to ensure that the monthly charges are accurate.
Identifying where contracts exist for each location is time-consuming but a required part of performing the inventory and audit steps. A quick-service restaurant learned the hard way that obtaining a global contract does not mean that you can set it up and forget about it.
For their 280 locations, the Internet Service Provider (ISP) set up services under contract, however, they set up an incorrect rate plan that caused this client to bill at a higher rate for each location’s Internet service.
The higher rate cost them $16,000.00 for the year, something that they had not budgeted for, and the overage caused financial reporting issues for their locations.
With the various types of services telephone or landlines, wireless, internet, long distance, etc. the steps to complete the inventory and audit are different for each type of service.
Ensuring that your partner is fully versed on each type of service and understanding what steps will be taken to audit each type of service will eliminate issues during the deliverable phase.
Upon completion of the project, you should have a set of these discoveries. It will also give you the baseline of information you need to effectively manage your environment on an ongoing basis, optimizing cost-effectiveness and efficiency.
Completion of this project will provide key insights, revealing what services are installed, where services are installed, what services are invoiced, and how much services cost.
This project will provide you with the comfort of a complete inventory of your telecom environment and will give you the baseline of information needed to manage your telecom environment in the most efficient and cost-effective manner.
With the skyrocketing costs for telecom services and the need for fiscal responsibility in the face of inflation and possible recession, it is imperative that a business consistently monitors their telecom and IT invoices and services.
How to Implement Telecom Expense Management: A Step-by-Step Guide
Implementing telecom expense management follows five steps: audit current telecom spend, develop a strategy based on what the audit finds, choose a TEM solution that fits the organization’s scale, implement it against a defined timeline, and monitor continuously afterward. Skipping the audit and jumping straight to software selection is the most common reason TEM implementations underdeliver.
Important Points Explained Ahead
- A telecom audit has to come first. Choosing software before knowing what you actually spend and where it leaks means optimizing against guesswork.
- Structured TEM implementation typically delivers 15% to 30% in telecom savings, a figure that holds consistently across RadiusPoint’s own client base and independent research alike.
- The global telecom expense management market has grown steadily as businesses recognize that unmanaged telecom spend scales faster than headcount.
- Complexity of billing, disparate internal systems, and lack of dedicated resources are the three most common reasons TEM implementations stall internally.
- Monitoring is not a final step, it is the ongoing discipline that keeps savings from eroding back to pre-audit levels within a year or two.
Short version: the software matters less than the sequence. Audit first, strategy second, solution third, implementation fourth, ongoing monitoring last, and each step depends on the one before it actually being done well.
Why Telecom Spend Needs Deliberate Management
Telecom expenses now represent a larger share of operating budgets than most finance teams expect, driven by distributed teams, constant connectivity requirements and a growing number of service providers per organization. Managing that spend without a structured process is difficult given how complex telecom billing has become, with voice, data and mobile services often billed by entirely separate providers under separate terms.
Structured TEM implementation typically delivers 15% to 30% in telecom savings, consistent with what independent research and RadiusPoint’s own client outcomes both show. Organizations that skip formal telecom expense management risk losing ground to competitors who have already converted that gap into recovered budget.
What Telecom Expenses Actually Include
Telecom expenses span voice, data and mobile services, each typically billed by different providers under different terms, plus hardware, software, maintenance and support layered on top. Voice services come from traditional landline or VoIP providers, data services cover internet connectivity and networking, and mobile services cover both voice and data plans for devices, each with its own billing quirks and error patterns.
Without active management, these components compound into unnecessary cost fast, since nobody outside a dedicated audit process is checking whether a given circuit, line or plan still matches what the organization actually needs.
The Five Steps to Implementing TEM
1. Conduct a telecom audit
The audit establishes visibility into current spend and identifies where inefficiency lives before any solution gets selected. Skipping this step means every later decision is based on assumption rather than data.
2. Develop a TEM strategy
Based on audit findings, define goals, objectives and an action plan covering rate optimization, contract renegotiation and error elimination, so the strategy targets the specific waste the audit actually found.
3. Choose a TEM solution
Evaluate scalability, customization and integration capabilities against the organization’s actual telecom footprint, not a generic feature checklist, since the right solution for a 40-location retailer looks different from the right solution for a single-site professional services firm.
4. Implement the solution
Integrate with existing systems, train employees, and build the processes that keep the platform accurate going forward, since a TEM platform is only as good as the inventory and contract data feeding it.
5. Monitor and optimize continuously
Regular monitoring keeps the savings the audit and implementation surfaced from eroding back to baseline. This is the step most commonly treated as optional, and the one whose absence explains why savings so often fade within a year or two.
Common Implementation Challenges and How to Address Them
| Challenge | How it gets addressed |
|---|---|
| Complexity of telecom billing across providers | A TEM solution with real-time, consolidated visibility across every vendor |
| Disparate internal systems and processes | Integration with ERP and finance systems rather than parallel spreadsheets |
| Lack of internal resources or expertise | Outsourcing to a specialist TEM provider rather than building in-house |
| Poor visibility into actual spend | Real-time reporting tied to the audit baseline, not a static annual snapshot |
| Difficulty negotiating vendor contracts | Leveraging a TEM provider’s rate benchmarking and negotiation experience |
Best Practices Once TEM Is Implemented
Regular audits, not just the initial one, keep visibility current as vendors, locations and services change over time. Automated invoice processing reduces both the labor cost and the error rate that manual review introduces, and clear policies defining who owns telecom spend decisions prevent the kind of decentralized purchasing that recreates the original problem.
Training the people actually using the platform matters as much as the platform itself, since a TEM solution nobody understands how to use degrades into a reporting tool nobody checks. Continuous monitoring closes the loop, turning implementation from a one-time project into an ongoing discipline.
How RadiusPoint Runs This Process End to End
RadiusPoint runs all five implementation steps through ExpenseLogic, starting every engagement with a telecom audit rather than a software demo, so the strategy that follows targets whatever the audit actually finds. This is the same telecom expense management discipline RadiusPoint has applied since 1992, and organizations evaluating whether to build this in-house or outsource it can see what to ask in questions to ask a TEM provider before you sign.
Frequently Asked Questions
How long does a full TEM implementation take?
Most organizations complete the audit and strategy phases within 60 to 90 days, with solution implementation and staff training following over the next one to two months, depending on inventory complexity and vendor count.
Can a small business implement TEM, or is it only for large enterprises?
The five-step process scales down as well as up. A smaller telecom footprint means a faster audit and a simpler implementation, not a fundamentally different process.
What is the biggest reason TEM implementations underdeliver?
Skipping or rushing the initial audit. Choosing a solution before understanding actual spend and waste means optimizing against assumptions instead of data, which limits how much the implementation can realistically recover.
Should TEM be managed in-house or outsourced?
It depends on internal resources and telecom complexity. Organizations without dedicated telecom expertise typically get faster, more complete results outsourcing to a specialist, since the audit and negotiation work benefit directly from vendor-specific experience.
How We Researched This
This page draws on RadiusPoint’s own client engagement data across telecom expense management implementations since 1992, and general industry research on TEM adoption and savings ranges. It was reviewed by Sharon Watkins, RadiusPoint’s founder and CEO.
Latest Updates
August 28, 2026: Fully rewritten from generic listicle content into an implementation-focused guide, correcting an inconsistent 40% savings claim to align with the 15-30% range documented elsewhere across RadiusPoint’s content.
References
- RadiusPoint client engagement data, telecom expense management implementation, 1992 to present
Related Articles
- Telecom Expense Management
- Questions to Ask a TEM Provider Before You Sign
- ExpenseLogic
- How Long a TEM Rollout Actually Takes
- The Data a TEM Provider Needs Before Day One
Savings ranges reflect industry research and RadiusPoint client outcomes and are not a guarantee of results for every organization. Actual savings depend on telecom footprint, contract complexity and implementation scope.
ESG Reporting: Eliminating 800 Man-Hours of Data Gathering
Many organizations have a workable Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) plan in place. However, Environmental Social Governance (ESG) will be the new benchmark going forward to ensure that both your organization and brand stay relevant and socially acceptable. How does your organization get ready and stay ready for this very intricate and detailed reporting that is required for electric, gas, and water consumption?
Challenge
A nationwide retailer with over 1,600 locations has required reporting for the electric, gas and water consumption for each one of their locations. The information required must be gathered from the monthly invoices. The time to gather this information manually would have taken over 800 hours which would have involved someone reviewing each invoice for each month and contacting the vendor for the necessary information that was missing from the invoice.
Issues to Resolve
- Time constraints – the reporting is needed during the 1st quarter of the year for the previous year
- Personnel constraints – The Accounts Payable team did not have time which required temporary staff to be hired
- Knowledge Gap – the vendor’s invoices vary from vendor to vendor so being able to read an electric, gas, or water invoice was necessary to get the work completed timely
- Invoice Availability – the invoices for a portion of the required review had been moved off-site and had to be recalled for this review.
Opportunity
Identifying the requirements early in the relationship with RadiusPoint and this client created the perfect opportunity for this client to have the required reporting in advance of the need. RadiusPoint provides the monthly utility expense management services for each of the 1,600 locations from receipt of the invoice to the bill pay portion of the process. This utility expense management also involves energy expense management that identifies the usage in kWh, therms, and gallons to create more detailed reporting. Using the information that was already being gathered from the invoices and adding the additional required information, RadiusPoint was able to ensure that this client had the required reporting by location for each type of service.
Solutions
The data usage that is needed from each invoice is compiled by the chosen ESG company that creates the client’s overall ESG report. Having this accurate data when it is needed was paramount to the client. The data is required during the first quarter of the next year for the previous year which puts a large burden on an already busy Accounts Payable department. RadiusPoint was able to pull together the reporting and provided an ongoing report solution so that the following year, the report would be completed by the last week of January for the entire previous year. This solution allows the RadiusPoint team to review the data and add any missing components on a monthly basis to ensure that all data is reported for the year by the beginning of the following year. This solution alone eliminated the normal delays of trying to identify who would be pulling together this information and when it would be provided.
Once the client looked at hiring temporary staff to pull the additional required data from the invoice, it was determined that this project would involve over 800 man-hours for the 1,600 locations. RadiusPoint’s solution provided most of the required usage data and the RadiusPoint team was able to go through and identify the missing information quickly to populate as required.
Utility invoices are not easily deciphered and having staff to read the invoices and gather the necessary data was a stumbling block for this client. Trying to find the staff that could perform this data gathering task that was knowledgeable about the electric, gas and water services was problematic. RadiusPoint’s team has an ESG department with knowledgeable personnel that easily filled this knowledge and personnel gap for the client.
Having the invoices on hand presented a problem for this client but it was one that was easily resolved by RadiusPoint. All invoices processed by RadiusPoint are electronically attached to the account number and the digital image is saved for up to seven (7) years. Reviewing past invoices was made easy with the information readily available at the click of a mouse.
The Results
Most ESG programs make provisions for reducing the cost of those services, but the “how” to achieve these cost reductions can be hard to predict. Measuring consumption is the first step in the right direction to reducing usage and monthly costs. The monthly ESG management services allow for the client to see the usage information on a monthly basis which in turn allows for necessary pivots that could result in a reduction of usage.
RadiusPoint’s monthly invoice processing and expense management services manage the utility invoice from receipt to payment of the invoice. Utility and telecom auditing are also important parts of the monthly service that allows RadiusPoint to fully manage the entire lifecycle of the utility or telecom invoice and service. This client saved over $48k and received their detailed and required ESG reporting on time.
Telecom Expense Management (TEM) – Auditing Telecom Invoices for Saving Opportunities
The telecom expense management (TEM) industry has grown in size over the last few years, concurrent with the evolution of telecom technology, the demand for bandwidth, and the rising use of wireless devices and video conference services during the pandemic.
As a result of these trends, medium-sized and large corporations have resorted to using the services of third-party providers specializing in the analysis of telecom vendor services and billing to curb the increasing weight of telecommunication services on their P&L.
As part of their mission, telecom expense management specialists like RadiusPoint audit the invoices issued by telecom and internet service providers, to detect cost-saving opportunities and erroneous charges driving up the cost of the lines.
TEM Auditing Terms Definitions
To do their invoice analysis, telecom expense management specialists must gather specific data points from the client and the telecom operators billing the client. Here are 11 data points that the TEM specialist always must collect. The TEM specialist provides the client with the 12th one in the following table.
Some definitions are necessary:
| DATA POINT | WHAT IT IS |
| Service Address / Identifier | The physical location or unique identification of the client’s telecom service |
| Service Provider | The company that provides telecom services to the client |
| Master Account Number | The main account number associated with the client’s services from the service provider |
| Sub-Account Number | Secondary account numbers tied to the master account often used to track usage and costs for specific departments or locations |
| Circuit ID/Number | A unique identifier for each circuit or line that connects the client’s service location to the service provider’s network |
| Circuit Type | The technology used for the circuit, such as T1, E1, DSL, MPLS, or Ethernet |
| Port Size | The bandwidth capacity of the port (measured in Mbps or Gbps) used to connect the client’s equipment to the service provider’s network |
| PVC (Permanent Virtual Circuit) | A virtual connection between two points on a network that simulates a dedicated physical connection |
| DLCI (Data Link Connection Identifier) | A unique number assigned to a PVC in a Frame Relay network, used to identify the virtual connection |
| CIR (Committed Information Rate) | The guaranteed minimum data transfer rate provided by the service provider for a particular circuit |
| Un-Audited MRC (Monthly Recurring Charge) | The monthly cost for the telecom service as billed by the service provider, before the audit |
| Audited MRC | The corrected or optimized monthly cost for the telecom service, identified during the audit process |
Data points: how they are used for Telecom audit
Each of the data points above has a role in the auditing process which will eventually lead to identifying potential savings or billing discrepancies. The table below summarizes the use of these data points.
| Data Point | Auditing Purpose & Identifying Savings/Discrepancies | Reference/Source Document | Flagging Cost-Saving Opportunities or Billing Discrepancies |
| Service Address / Identifier | Verify service locations and validate service usage | Service provider invoices, contracts, and client’s internal records | Compare the service address with the client’s records to identify unused services or locations |
| Service Provider | Ensure appropriate providers and services are being used | Service provider invoices and contract | Look for better rates or service options from alternative providers or negotiate with the current provider |
| Master Account Number | Verify account accuracy and organization | Service provider invoices and contract | Ensure charges are billed to the correct account and identify unauthorized charges |
| Sub-Account Number | Analyze costs and usage by department or location | Service provider invoices and client’s internal records | Identify high-usage areas, reallocate resources, or uncover billing errors |
| Circuit ID/Number | Validate the circuits and their usage | Service provider invoices, contracts, and circuit inventory | Compare circuit IDs with inventory to identify unused circuits or billing discrepancies |
| Circuit Type | Assess if the correct technology is being used | Service provider invoices, contracts, and client’s internal records | Evaluate if a more cost-effective or efficient circuit type is available |
| Port Size | Check if the bandwidth capacity meets the client’s needs | Service provider invoices, contracts, and client’s internal records | Identify underused ports or opportunities to upgrade/downgrade for cost savings |
| PVC | Validate virtual connections between network points | Service provider invoices, contracts, and client’s internal records | Ensure PVCs are correctly billed and identify unused or unnecessary virtual connections |
| DLCI | Confirm Frame Relay network connections | Service provider invoices, contracts, and client’s internal records | Verify DLCIs match the client’s records and identify billing discrepancies |
| CIR | Ensure the guaranteed data transfer rate is being met | Service provider invoices, contracts, and client’s internal records | Monitor actual usage vs. CIR to identify opportunities for negotiation or cost savings |
| Un-Audited MRC | Establish a baseline for monthly telecom expenses | Service provider invoices | Compare with audited MRC to determine cost-saving opportunities |
| Audited MRC | Identify optimized monthly telecom expenses after the audit | Service provider invoices and audit findings | Validate the effectiveness of the audit and track potential savings |
TEM Cost-saving opportunities
Once the information has been collected, and the telecom operators‘ billing has been analyzed, the TEM specialist looks for specific types of cost-savings their client can make on their telecom bills.
Here are 10 types of cost-savings a TEM specialist would look for:
- Unused services: Discontinue services or circuits that are no longer in use, which helps reduce monthly costs.
- Negotiated rates: Renegotiate contracts with the service provider to obtain better service rates or discounts.
- Service bundling: Combine multiple services or features into a bundled package for discounted rates.
- Optimized service plans: Choose service plans that better match usage patterns, such as unlimited plans for high usage, or pay-as-you-go plans for variable usage.
- Technology upgrades: Replace outdated or inefficient circuits with newer, more cost-effective technologies.
- Volume discounts: Leverage the client’s purchasing power to negotiate volume discounts based on the number of lines or the total spending.
- Optimization of port sizes: Adjust port sizes to match the client’s bandwidth requirements more accurately, avoiding over- or under-provisioning.
- Resource reallocation: Identify high-usage areas and redistribute resources or services to better align with the organization’s needs.
- Tax and regulatory fee adjustments: Verify and correct taxes and regulatory fees, which can result in cost savings if errors are found.
- Alternative providers: Research and consider alternative service providers offering better rates or service options.
Typical telecom overcharging situations and billing errors
TEM specialists use proprietary SaaS platforms to automate the analysis and processing of telecom bills. These complex systems compare the client’s current telecom invoices with the vendor’s conditions, the line number, and the device ID when applicable.
The function of these SaaS platforms is to accelerate and systematize the processing of telecom invoices, a big organization with hundreds of retail locations that can quickly become a monthly nightmare for their Accounts Payable department. In fact, it is not uncommon for a large organization to have to process over a thousand telecom invoices in the course of a month. This represents a very large workload, and when reduced by automation, sizable soft-dollar savings for the organization.
The TEM specialist sets up the SaaS platform to flag out any inconsistency in telecom billing, and mismatch with known rates. Here is an example of 10 common overcharges and billing errors found in a telecom operator’s invoice:
- Double billing: Charges for the same service or feature appear multiple times on the invoice.
- Incorrect rates: Charges that do not match the contracted rates or discounts agreed upon with the service provider.
- Unauthorized charges: Charges for services or features not requested or approved by the client.
- Misapplied taxes: Incorrect application of taxes or regulatory fees, resulting in overcharges.
- Billing for disconnected services: Charges for previously disconnected or terminated services.
- Incorrect usage charges: Overstated charges due to metering errors or inaccurate data.
- Billing for non-existent locations: Charges for services at places where the client lacks telecom services.
- Incorrect service plan charges: Charges for a more expensive service plan than agreed upon or requested.
- Incorrect circuit charges: Charges for circuits not in the client’s inventory or assigned incorrect circuit IDs.
- Late payment fees and penalties: Unwarranted late payment fees or penalties that are not justified based on the client’s payment history or the contract terms.
The TEM specialist’s job is to flag these errors and let the Accounts Payable department deal with the vendors to recover credits and refunds.
But TEM specialists like RadiusPoint offer their clients to take over this part of the service, and recover credits and refunds themselves, as well as follow up with billing corrections so that the same errors don’t reappear in the next billing cycle.
By identifying cost-saving opportunities and billing discrepancies, and requesting refunds and credits from telecom operators, Telecom Expense Management specialists ensure their clients can curb the rising costs of telecommunications services, spend no more than what is necessary for their organization to operate, and offer their clients valuable business intelligence about the utilization of their telecom assets and their allocation by cost centers. This enables an organization to make better-informed decisions in procurement, cost allocation, and technology.
Inventory Management Uncovers Hidden Assets and Services
Inventory management is one of the eight cornerstone functions of ExpenseLogic®…Read More
Cost Reduction Plan Saves 2,000+ Man-Hours
Any cost reduction plan implemented in the context of an acquisition or a divestiture must take into account…Read More
Invoice Audits – Which is More Beneficial: One-off or Monthly?
When evaluating invoice audit frequency requirements in the process…Read More
Cost Avoidance & Savings: $40K in UEM Cost Optimization
This case study is about cost avoidance and cost savings in utility expense management…Read More
Inventory Management Helps Recovering $174K in Credits
Inventory management is one of the 8 cornerstone functions of our SaaS platform, ExpenseLogic…Read More
Missing Due Diligence Inventory Adds $15K to Acquisition Cost
When making an acquisition, it pays off for the acquiring company to add a due diligence inventory of…Read More
$1.3M Savings Generated Across 5 Acquisitions
Discussing mergers and acquisitions, accounting and consulting firm Deloitte stated…Read More
Audit Uncovers Unrealized Cost Savings of $250K+
This case study focuses on the potential for cost savings stemming from a…Read More
Vendor Management: 13.6% Savings on Cleaning Services
This vendor management case study is a good example of how RadiusPoint helps large organizations generate…Read More