How many phone lines, mobile devices and data circuits is your agency paying for this month? Who approved the last one that was added? The first answer is usually spread across carrier invoices. The second may not be written down anywhere, and it’s the one an auditor will ask for.
Government telecom expense management (TEM) means running the kind of telecom expense management government auditors expect: every line, device and circuit an agency pays for is tied to an inventory of record, an approved order and an audited invoice. In an agency, that record matters more than the rate. Procurement rules decide who may order a service and under which contract, budget cycles decide which year’s money pays for it, and public accountability means any charge can end up in an inspector general’s report. The same few controls answer all three: a current inventory, approved moves, adds, changes and disconnects (MACD), a usage review that closes idle lines and an audit trail that outlasts staff turnover.
When those controls slip, the cost ends up on the public record. In December 2025, California’s State Auditor reported that the state’s Employment Development Department (EDD) paid $4,623,352 in monthly service fees for 6,285 mobile devices that went unused for four or more consecutive months between November 2020 and April 2025. An EDD official told the auditor the department had been receiving its carrier’s nonusage reports since 2017, yet the branch using the devices said its staff didn’t evaluate whether they were being used.
RadiusPoint, founded in 1992, does this work for clients through ExpenseLogic, its expense management platform, and a team that audits every invoice line, runs MACD ticketing with client-defined approval workflows and keeps inventory, cost allocation and reporting current. Government is one of the industries RadiusPoint serves.
Key Takeaways
- Government TEM ties every telecom line, device and circuit to an inventory of record, an approved order and an audited invoice.
- Procurement rules, fiscal year budgets and public accountability shift the priority from rates to records: who ordered, under which contract, from which budget and with whose approval.
- Public audits from 2010 to 2025 keep finding the same gaps: incomplete inventories, no regular usage review and lines that keep billing after the need ends.
- Set a written threshold for idle lines, review every carrier account’s usage each billing cycle and close lines through an approved disconnect ticket.
- Keep approval rules and decisions inside the agency, even when a provider does the audit, inventory and ticket work.
Short version: If your agency can’t show the approved order, the current user and the audited invoice behind any telecom line, fix the inventory of record and the approval trail before you negotiate a single rate.
What Is Government Telecom Expense Management?
Government telecom expense management controls an agency’s telecom inventory, orders, invoices and payments so every charge traces back to an approved, documented decision. The mechanics match commercial TEM. The difference is who checks the work: inspectors general, state auditors, legislative staff and the public, sometimes years after payment.
The core tasks, covered in what telecom expense management is and how it works, don’t change in government: inventory, ordering, invoice audit, dispute recovery, cost allocation and payment. What changes is the scrutiny.
Public sector telecom spend is large enough to draw that scrutiny. A 2015 report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) cited the most recent estimate from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB): about $1.2 billion a year on about 1.5 million federal mobile devices and associated services. At the state level, Texas Legislative Budget Board staff reported in 2019 that state agencies spent about $474.4 million on telecommunications-related services across fiscal years 2016 and 2017.
Agency Audits Keep Finding the Same Three Gaps
Agency audits keep finding three gaps: no complete inventory of record, no regular review of usage, and no proof that approved disconnects stopped the billing. The reports below cover federal, state and city governments from 2010 to 2025, and none of the findings shown here turned on a carrier’s rate.
| Audit (office, year) | What it found | Control that was missing |
|---|---|---|
| New Jersey Office of the State Comptroller, 2010 | The state paid for more than 19,000 unused phone lines, nearly one in six state lines. Disconnecting them was expected to save more than $3.2 million a year. | A current inventory and a regular disconnect review |
| U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-15-431, 2015 | Only 5 of 15 federal agencies reviewed had complete service and device inventories, and only 1 of 15 had documented procedures for reviewing devices for overuse, underuse or zero use. | An inventory of record and a documented usage review |
| Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Office of Inspector General, 2019 | Monthly usage certifications weren’t completed or provided for 210 of 726 department cell phones in the month reviewed. | A monthly usage sign-off by the user or supervisor |
| U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of Inspector General, Report No. 562, 2020 | The agency spent almost $732,000 on 1,567 devices with zero usage between October 2018 and December 2019. | A periodic review of carrier usage reports |
| City of Baltimore, Office of the Inspector General, 2020 | City agencies paid about $108,451.80 from September 2017 through February 2020 for 204 Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) lines they reported they weren’t using. | Disconnect tracking through to the invoice |
| California State Auditor, Report I2025-1, 2025 | EDD paid $4,623,352 in monthly fees for 6,285 mobile devices unused for four or more consecutive months, from November 2020 through April 2025. | Assigned review of carrier nonusage reports and a written cancellation threshold |
Read together, the reports show what an agency telecom audit checks first: whether the agency knows what it’s paying for, whether anyone reviews usage and whether a disconnect actually ends the charge. In New Jersey and Baltimore, lines that were disconnected or believed inactive kept showing up on bills.
Why Do Procurement Rules and Budget Cycles Change TEM?
Procurement rules and budget cycles change TEM because they decide who may order a service, under which contract and from which year’s budget. Public accountability adds a third test: the record behind every charge has to hold up in an audit, a records request or a legislative hearing.
| Government constraint | What it means for telecom | TEM control that addresses it |
|---|---|---|
| Procurement rules | Services should be ordered under a contract the agency is allowed to use, by staff with authority to order | MACD tickets with an approval step on every order, and contract rates tied to each service ID |
| Contracted rates | An invoice is only correct if each line bills at the rate in that contract | Line-item audit of every invoice line against contracted rates and the inventory |
| Budget cycles | Money is planned and committed by fiscal year, fund and program | Cost allocation by cost center or program, accrual and general ledger (GL) files, and a yearly line review timed before the budget request |
| Public accountability | Auditors, inspectors general and the public can ask for the record behind any charge | An inventory of record plus ticket, audit and dispute history kept for the agency’s retention period |
| Segregation of duties | No one person should request, approve, receive and pay for the same service | Separate requester, approver and invoice review roles built into the workflow |
| Staff turnover and reorganization | Lines outlast the people, offices and programs they were ordered for | User checks against the current staff roster, zero use reviews and closed-site billing reports |
| Decentralized ordering | Field offices order locally while a central office pays | One inventory across every billing account, with missing-invoice tracking and costs split to the offices that use them |
| Carrier authorization | Carriers share records and accept changes only from authorized people | A letter of agency (LOA) that names who may act for the agency and what it covers |
Budget timing differs by level of government. The federal fiscal year begins on October 1 under 31 U.S.C. 1102. According to the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL), 46 states began fiscal year 2026 on July 1, 2025, while New York starts its fiscal year on April 1, Texas on September 1, and Alabama and Michigan on October 1. Schedule the yearly line review to finish before your next budget request is built, so the request funds lines you’ll keep rather than lines nobody uses.
Procurement rules matter for a quieter reason. A contract sets the rate, and an invoice is only right if each line bills under that contract. When a field office calls a carrier directly, the new service can land on a separate account at standard rates, outside any contract the agency competed. An approval step on every order, followed by an audit of every invoice line against contracted rates, keeps purchases and prices inside the rules.
An Inventory of Record Comes Before Any Zero Use Cleanup
An inventory of record lists every line, device and circuit an agency pays for, with its location, user, cost center and contract attached. Zero use reviews depend on it, because a carrier’s usage report shows idle numbers but not who holds them or whether a program still needs them.
Most of the federal agencies GAO reviewed in 2015 didn’t have one. Only 5 of 15 had complete service and device inventories, and GAO wrote that “the remaining agencies either did not have inventories or those inventories did not account for all devices and services.” In a 2020 report on five agencies’ plans to move telecom services to new contracts, GAO noted that officials at three of them said they weren’t responsible for tracking all the telecom services in use, so they couldn’t provide complete inventories. Texas Legislative Budget Board staff reached the same conclusion for state agencies in 2019, noting that without a central inventory, agencies “have a limited ability to improve efficiencies, such as verifying proper device usage.”
Build the inventory from the carriers’ records, not from memory. Customer service records (CSRs) show what each carrier believes is on each account, and a telecom inventory of record built from CSRs gives you a list to reconcile against invoices, locations and the current staff roster. Every service that bills but has no owner, location or cost center goes on a review list.
Then set the rule for idle lines in writing. California’s State Auditor recommended that EDD terminate service for mobile devices not used for 90 consecutive days, and EDD put a departmentwide policy along those lines into effect on September 3, 2025. In the Texas survey, three agencies said they eliminate lines with no usage over a set period, with review frequency ranging from one month to six months. Once the threshold is set, the review runs the same way every cycle:
- Pull usage reports for every carrier account each billing cycle. California’s findings came from one of EDD’s 22 accounts with its carrier, and the auditor said the total was likely understated.
- Flag zero use mobile lines, idle landlines and circuits with no traffic, and match each one to its user, location and cost center in the inventory.
- Ask the assigned user’s supervisor or the program owner to confirm whether each flagged line is still needed, with a response deadline.
- Close confirmed lines through an approved disconnect ticket, recover the device and check the next invoice to confirm the charge stopped.
- Record the outcome either way, including who decided to keep a low-use line and why.
RadiusPoint builds this check into ExpenseLogic by pairing zero use device identification with Employee ID validation against a monthly HR roster, so lines assigned to former staff surface alongside lines nobody uses.
How Do MACD Approvals and Audit Trails Answer Public Accountability?
MACD approvals answer public accountability by recording who requested each move, add, change or disconnect, who approved it, what it costs and when billing changed. Kept together, those tickets become the audit trail an inspector general or state auditor asks to see, long after the staff who handled them have moved on.
Federal internal control standards point the same way. GAO’s Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government, revised in 2025 and effective beginning with fiscal year 2026, says segregation of duties “helps prevent fraud, waste, and abuse” by “considering the need to separate authority, custody, and accounting.” For telecom, that means the person who requests a line shouldn’t be the one who approves it, and neither should be the person who confirms the invoice is right.
The telecom MACD process works the same way in an agency as anywhere else, but government tickets need two extra fields: the fund, program or cost center that pays, and the contract the order falls under. A workable role split looks like this:
- Requester: program staff or a manager, who states the business need.
- Approver: the budget holder for the cost center that will pay.
- Fulfillment: the telecom or IT office, which places the order under the right contract.
- Invoice review: finance, accounts payable or an audit provider, which confirms the charge matches the approved order and the contracted rate.
When an outside provider will deal with carriers for the agency, carriers usually want written authorization first. Decide who signs the telecom letter of agency, what it authorizes and when it ends before any work starts, and file a copy with the audit trail.
Use this audit trail checklist for each line, device or circuit. If the record can’t answer a question, that’s the gap to close first.
- What is it (service ID, phone number or circuit ID), where is it, and which cost center, fund or program pays for it?
- Which contract does it bill under, and at what rate?
- Who is it assigned to today, and does that person still appear on the staff roster?
- Who requested it, who approved it, when and for what business reason?
- What has changed since, and who approved each change?
- Did the carrier confirm each order, and did the next invoice reflect it?
- What did each month’s invoice audit find: matched, disputed or corrected?
- For every dispute, when was it filed and when did the credit post?
- When was usage last reviewed, and who confirmed the line is still needed?
- If it was disconnected, where are the ticket, the carrier confirmation and the first invoice without the charge?
- Which LOA, if any, authorized an outside party to act on it?
What Should an Agency Ask a TEM Provider?
An agency should ask a TEM provider how invoices are audited, who approves changes, how disputes are tracked and who keeps the records. Those answers decide whether the agency can still explain its telecom spend after the people who set up the program have moved on, and whether an auditor can follow the trail without the provider in the room.
- Does the audit check every invoice line against contracted rates and the inventory, or only a sample?
- Can approval rules follow the agency’s own structure (by cost center, program or role), and does each ticket record the requester, approver and dates?
- How are disputes tracked until the credit posts, and how are credits reported back to the program that paid?
- How does the provider confirm that a disconnect stopped the billing?
- Can costs be allocated by fund, program or cost center, and can accrual and GL files match the agency’s chart of accounts?
- How are idle lines and lines assigned to former staff identified each cycle?
- Who in the agency signs the LOA, and what exactly will it authorize?
- If invoices will be paid through the provider, how is the account funded and how are payments reconciled?
- Will the agency own its inventory, ticket history and audit results, and can it export them in a usable format at any time, including when the contract ends?
Whatever the answers, keep the decisions in house. A provider can maintain the inventory, audit invoices, file disputes and process tickets, while the agency sets the approval rules, decides what to order or disconnect, owns contract decisions and signs.
How RadiusPoint Supports Public Sector Telecom Control With ExpenseLogic
RadiusPoint supports public sector telecom control with ExpenseLogic, keeping inventory, MACD approvals, invoice audit, cost allocation and reporting in one record its team works monthly. The agency sets the approval rules and makes the decisions, and RadiusPoint’s team does the audit and administrative work against those rules.
Each gap from the audit reports maps to an ExpenseLogic telecom expense management capability:
- Inventory and idle lines: ExpenseLogic tracks devices by serial number and Employee ID, validates Employee IDs against a monthly HR roster and identifies zero use devices. Closed-location billing exception reports flag services still billing at sites that have closed.
- Approvals and contracts: MACD ticketing runs on client-defined approval workflows. Vendor contract management ties expiration dates and rates to service IDs, and contract obligation alerts cover termination fees and dates.
- Invoice audit: RadiusPoint’s line-item audit checks every invoice line against contracted rates and the inventory across wireline, wireless and data circuits. Daily missing-bill reporting shows when an expected invoice hasn’t arrived.
- Budgets and accounting: Costs are allocated to cost centers, including split billing a circuit across several, and ExpenseLogic produces monthly accrual files and GL interface files for the accounting system.
- Records: Reporting includes budget reports, scheduled email delivery and export to Excel, CSV and PDF. Contract management stores contract images and terms, and document management recalls stored images by permission.
RadiusPoint can pay vendor invoices for clients once the client funds the account.
One non-government example shows the inventory work in practice. For a healthcare provider, RadiusPoint identified and deactivated dormant business lines, which led to a 26% reduction in the client’s annual telecom spend. It’s a single client’s result, not a forecast for an agency.
RadiusPoint was founded in 1992 and is a women-owned business. Amalgam Insights named RadiusPoint a Distinguished Vendor in its 2024 TEM Vendor SmartList, and ExpenseLogic is rated 4.8 from 31 reviews on Capterra.
Every billing cycle an idle line stays on an account, the agency pays for it again, and the record of why gets harder to rebuild. To see how the inventory, approval workflows and audit trail work together, request an ExpenseLogic demonstration.
Frequently Asked Questions
Do state and local agencies need different TEM controls than federal agencies?
No, the controls are the same: an inventory of record, approved MACD tickets, a usage review, an invoice audit and an audit trail. What differs is the rulebook. Federal agencies apply GAO’s internal control standards, while state and local agencies follow their own statutes, procurement codes, internal control rules and records schedules. Match approval levels, fiscal year timing and record retention to the rules your agency answers to.
How long should a line go unused before an agency cancels it?
Pick a threshold, write it into policy and apply it every billing cycle. California’s State Auditor recommended 90 consecutive days for EDD, and agencies in the 2019 Texas survey reported review periods from one month to six months. Before canceling, confirm the need with the assigned user or program owner, and check the contract for early termination fees or minimum commitments that change the math.
Does handing TEM to a provider mean giving up control of telecom decisions?
It shouldn’t. A provider can audit invoices, maintain the inventory, track disputes and process MACD tickets, while the agency keeps the approval rules, every decision to order or disconnect, contract decisions and the final signature. Put that split in writing, limit the LOA to the work the provider is doing and make sure the agency can export its own data at any time.
Who should own telecom spend inside an agency, IT or finance?
Usually both, with one named owner for the inventory of record. The telecom or IT office places orders and manages services, finance allocates and pays, and program managers approve what their budgets fund. In the 2019 Texas survey, seven of 12 responding agencies said they delegated phone usage monitoring mostly to individual departments, which is how lines slip between offices without anyone seeing the whole account.
How can an agency estimate what a TEM program might save?
Build the estimate from your own records, not a published percentage. Count lines with no usage past your threshold and multiply by their monthly charges, then add billed rates that exceed contracted rates and services still billing at closed sites. That gives a range you can defend in a budget request. Treat any case study figure, including RadiusPoint’s, as an example rather than a forecast.
What should happen to carrier credits and refunds once they’re recovered?
Record each one against the service ID, cost center and fund that paid the original charge, then apply it the way your agency’s accounting rules require. Log the dispute amount, filing date and posting date, and confirm the credit on a later invoice before closing the dispute. Without that trail, credits on a consolidated account are hard to trace back to the program that overpaid.
References
- California State Auditor, “Investigations of Improper Activities by State Agencies and Employees,” Report I2025-1, December 12, 2025. auditor.ca.gov
- U.S. Government Accountability Office, “Telecommunications: Agencies Need Better Controls to Achieve Significant Savings on Mobile Devices and Services,” GAO-15-431, May 21, 2015. gao.gov
- U.S. Government Accountability Office, “Telecommunications: Agencies Should Fully Implement Established Transition Planning Practices to Help Reduce Risk of Costly Delays,” GAO-20-155, April 7, 2020. gao.gov
- U.S. Government Accountability Office, “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government,” GAO-25-107721, May 15, 2025. gao.gov
- U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of Inspector General, “Opportunities Exist To Improve the SEC’s Management of Mobile Devices and Services,” Report No. 562, September 30, 2020. oversight.gov
- City of Baltimore, Office of the Inspector General, “Investigative Report Synopsis,” OIG Case No. 20-0019-I, May 13, 2020. baltimorecity.gov
- Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Office of Inspector General, “Review of Wireless Services Usage Certifications for Department Issued Cell Phones,” Report A-1819DEP-013, March 25, 2019. floridadep.gov
- New Jersey Office of the State Comptroller, “Comptroller audit finds state government wastes millions annually due to unused phone lines,” press release, July 7, 2010. nj.gov
- Texas Legislative Budget Board staff, “Improve Telecommunications Management Practices to Reduce State Agency Costs,” April 2019. lbb.texas.gov
- United States Code, Title 31, Section 1102, “Fiscal year,” Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School. law.cornell.edu
- National Conference of State Legislatures, “FY 2026 State Budget Status,” 2025. ncsl.org
- RadiusPoint, “Healthcare Case Study: Telecom Expenses Down by 26% in Healthcare,” December 28, 2023.
- RadiusPoint, “About RadiusPoint.”
- Amalgam Insights, “Amalgam Insights Unveils Vendor SmartList for Telecom Expense Management, Spotlighting 11 Distinguished Solutions,” EIN Presswire, February 1, 2024. einpresswire.com
- Capterra, “ExpenseLogic” product reviews, 4.8 from 31 reviews. capterra.com
This article is general information for finance, IT, procurement and telecom staff in public agencies. It isn’t legal, procurement, audit or financial advice, and your agency’s statutes, procurement rules, internal control standards and records schedules govern how these controls apply. Audit findings cited here describe the agencies and periods named in each report. The RadiusPoint result cited comes from a single non-government client engagement and isn’t a guarantee of results for any agency.
